Skip to content

Sub-industry · Recruitment & Staffing

Watch every role move from applied to offer, and retire the spreadsheet.

We build the pipeline board that screens applications against the criteria your clients actually set, chases interview slots and feedback, and keeps every hiring call with your recruiters.

Screened only against the criteria a role owner setsInterview slots proposed, never assumedClient feedback chased until it lands
live
candidate pipeline · by stage

Applied

54

Screened

26

Submitted

11

Interview

6

Offer

2

Open roles · 3

Wed 22 Jul

Senior Backend EngineerMeridian Foods
21
10
4
3
1
Plant Operations ManagerCorwin Logistics
19
9
4
2
0
Staff AccountantHalden & Ruiz Group
14
7
3
1
1

Screening flagged a missing certification on 2 candidates for Meridian Foods. Recruiter notified, nothing auto-declined.

An open-roles board: applied through offer, one column per stage.

On the board

Time to hire, measured stage by stage

Time sitting in an inbox before screening

Same day

checked against role criteria as an application arrives

Time to a client-ready shortlist

5.4 days avg

from role brief to a shortlist a recruiter has reviewed

Interview scheduling turnaround

31 hrs avg

from a candidate agreeing to interview to a slot confirmed

Client feedback turnaround

3.8 days avg

chased on a fixed cadence until a decision comes back

Where a search stalls

What eats a recruiter's week

Applicant overload

A popular role can draw hundreds of applications, and reading every résumé by hand buries a recruiter before screening even starts.

Screening that drifts

Without a shared checklist, one recruiter's read of \"meets requirements\" isn't the next recruiter's, and the client notices.

A shortlist built too slowly

A strong candidate rarely waits around for a shortlist that takes a week to compile by hand.

Scheduling that eats the day

Chasing candidate and interviewer calendars for a single slot can cost a recruiter an afternoon per role.

Feedback that goes quiet

A client sits on interview feedback and a candidate is left waiting, with nobody chasing either side.

A candidate experience that slips

Silence between stages is the single fastest way to lose a candidate to a faster-moving offer.

The shortlist

Senior Backend Engineer · Meridian Foods

Four candidates cleared the criteria Meridian Foods set for this role. Availability and status are laid out plainly. Nothing here is a rank order, just what was checked.

JOJ. Okonkwo-Reyes2 weeks notice

Meets stated requirements

RDR. DelacroixImmediate

Meets stated requirements

TVT. Vukovic1 month notice

Flagged: missing AWS certification

AMA. Mbeki-Larsen3 weeks notice

Meets stated requirements

Every name here matched the role brief on file. The recruiter decides who actually goes forward.

Screening criteria

Checked against what a role owner actually set

Every application is read against the criteria captured at intake. No house standard, no guesswork. A gap gets flagged for a recruiter; it never quietly removes anyone from the running.

Years of experience

5+ years backend engineering

Required

Core stack

Go or Java, plus a relational database

Required

Certification

AWS or equivalent cloud certification

Required

Notice period

6 weeks or less

Preferred

Location

Within commuting distance or remote-eligible

Preferred

These are the criteria Meridian Foods set for this role. The assistant checks applications against them and flags gaps. It doesn't rank people or decide who's a good fit.

The pipeline, role by role

Every candidate exactly where a recruiter put them

Open a role and its candidates are sitting at the stage a recruiter moved them to, each with an availability line and a screening note pulled from the criteria on file. No score, no guesswork.

  • Every candidate on the board sits at the stage a recruiter actually moved them to
  • Screening notes reference the role's own criteria, never a generated score
  • Interview slots are proposed against real calendars, never assumed booked
  • Nothing on this board is a hiring decision. That stays with the recruiter and the client
role pipeline · Senior Backend Engineer4 active

Senior Backend Engineer

Meridian Foods · as of Wed 22 Jul

J. Okonkwo-Reyes2 weeks notice · Panel set for Thu 2:00pmInterview
R. DelacroixImmediate · Awaiting client confirmationInterview
A. Mbeki-Larsen3 weeks notice · With client since MonSubmitted
T. Vukovic1 month notice · Certification gap flaggedScreened

Note: availability and stage only, never a fit score.

See a role move

Watch one role's pipeline move from applied to a client-ready shortlist

Point us at one open role and its criteria, and we'll stand up the board, with screening, scheduling, and the feedback chase running against it live.

Board set up from your role briefScreening against your stated criteriaFeedback chased until it lands

Interview scheduling

Slots proposed against real calendars, never assumed

Role & panel

Senior Backend Engineer

Meridian Foods

D. Farrow, Eng. Manager

K. Osei, Staff Engineer

Proposed slots

J. Okonkwo-ReyesThu 22 Jul · 2:00pmConfirmed
R. DelacroixFri 23 Jul · 10:30amAwaiting client
A. Mbeki-LarsenMon 26 Jul · 3:00pmAwaiting candidate

The feedback chase

A reminder that keeps going until someone answers

Day 0

Interview feedback requested from Meridian Foods

Day 2

First reminder sent, no response yet

Day 4

Second reminder sent, flagged to the hiring manager directly

Day 5

Feedback received: moving R. Delacroix to offer stage

A recruiter sets the cadence once. The chase runs itself until a client actually responds.

What the pipeline hands back

A candidate pipeline pre-loaded from the role brief, tracking every stage from applied to offer

Screening checked against the criteria a role owner actually set, with gaps flagged for a recruiter to review

A shortlist a recruiter reviews and releases before a client ever sees it

Interview scheduling coordinated across candidate and panel calendars

Client feedback chased on a fixed cadence, with every response logged to the role

A clean handoff of the pipeline and its history once a role closes

A cadence that already knows when to escalate

One overdue response is usually enough to see it work. Reminders run on the schedule a recruiter sets, stepping up to the hiring manager only once that schedule calls for it.

How it works

Set up once, then the board runs on its own

Load the role

A role brief and its criteria come off the client intake call onto the board. Nothing gets typed twice.

Screen on arrival

Applications are checked against that role's stated criteria as they land, with no weekly batch to wait for.

Chase what's outstanding

Interview slots and client feedback get chased on a set cadence until they actually land.

Hand back the board

Recruiters keep every decision. The board just keeps the pipeline honest and moving.

Questions

What recruiting leads ask first

Want to see it against a role you're working right now? We'll stand up a pipeline from the real brief.

No. It checks an application against the criteria a role owner sets and flags what matches or is missing. Who goes on a shortlist, and who gets hired, is always a recruiter's and a client's call.

Every check runs against the same stated criteria for every applicant to a role (years of experience, certifications, availability), never against protected characteristics, and every flag is visible to the recruiter who reviews it.

It proposes slots against real candidate and panel calendars and tracks confirmations, but a recruiter can always adjust or override a proposed time.

Reminders go out on a cadence a recruiter sets, escalating to the hiring manager directly if needed, until a response actually comes back.

We connect to the applicant tracking and client systems you already run, so candidates, roles, and client relationships stay in sync in one place.

Have a project?

Let's talk

Running a large platform, shaping a first MVP, or getting a product ready for a funding round? Tell us where you are. We'll shape the process around it, and stay with you after launch.